How Many Pages Are in the Book David and Goliath Underdogs Misfits and the Art of Battling Giants
 First edition cover | |
| Writer | Malcolm Gladwell |
|---|---|
| Country | United States |
| Language | English language |
| Field of study | Psychology, sociology |
| Genre | Non-fiction |
| Publisher | Piffling, Brownish and Company |
| Publication date | Oct one, 2013 |
| Media type | Hardback, audiobook |
| Pages | 320 |
| ISBN | 978-0-316-20436-one |
| OCLC | 866564460 |
| LC Class | 2008661714 |
| Preceded past | What the Dog Saw, 2009 |
| Followed past | Talking to Strangers, 2019 |
David and Goliath: Underdogs, Misfits, and the Art of Battling Giants is a non-fiction book written by Malcolm Gladwell and published by Little, Chocolate-brown and Company on October 1, 2013. The book focuses on the probability of improbable events occurring in situations where i event is profoundly favored over the other. The volume contains many different stories of these underdogs who wind up beating the odds, the nearly famous being the story of David and Goliath. Despite mostly negative reviews, the book was a bestseller, rise to #4 on The New York Times Hardcover Non-fiction chart,[1] and #5 on Usa Today 'southward Best-Selling Books.[2]
Origin [edit]
The book is partially inspired by an commodity Gladwell wrote for The New Yorker in 2009 entitled "How David Beats Goliath".[iii] [4]
Summary [edit]
David and Goliath employs individual case studies and comparing to provide a wide range of examples where perceived major disadvantages in fact turn out to be the keys to the underdog Davids' triumph confronting Goliath-like opponents or situations. In one arc, Gladwell cites various seeming afflictions that may in fact accept significantly contributed to success, linking dyslexia with the high-flying career of lawyer David Boies, and the loss of a parent at an early on age with the exceptional research work of oncologist Emil "Jay" Freireich. These anecdotal lessons are anchored by references to research in the social sciences.
Other examples include: Vivek Ranadive, and a middle school girls' basketball team in Redwood City; Teresa DeBrito, and the touch on of class size regulations; Caroline Sacks, and choosing betwixt going to a height-tier higher or a second-tier college; David Boies and how he all the same has a great career despite having or maybe because of his dyslexia or a desirable difficulty; Jay Frederich and his cancer research, London bombings in Globe War II, and the effect of "remote misses" on the urban center'due south morale and a person's backbone; activist Wyatt Walker and how he and Martin Luther King Jr. were able to make the Birmingham riot of 1963 a historically significant event in the ceremonious rights motility using Brer Rabbit-similar tactics; Rosemary Lawlor and how the Northern Irish police force's reaction to religious riots in Belfast in 1969 led to a 30-year conflict chosen The Troubles, and contrasting this to how a police force officer in New York Urban center created a program that connected with troubled youths and their families; how Mike Reynolds' reaction to a family fellow member beingness murdered led to the California Three-strikes law and how Wilma Derksen's reaction led to a completely dissimilar issue; and André Trocmé, a pastor in a small town in the French mountains Le Chambon-sur-Lignon that stood upwardly to the Nazi authorities and harbored Jewish refugees.
Critical reception [edit]
Critical response to David and Goliath was largely negative. The book was unfavorably reviewed twice in The New York Times. Janet Maslin quipped, "As usual, Mr. Gladwell's science is convenient", and she concludes that "the volume'southward eye section is its messiest", where the author attempts to link the experiences of famous dyslexics such as Brian Grazer and David Boies.[5] Joe Nocera called the book "deeply repetitive and a bewildering sprawl," suggesting that "[1000]aybe what 'David and Goliath' really illustrates is that it's time for Malcolm Gladwell to find a new shtick."[6]
Writing in Esquire, Tom Junod echoed Nocera's conclusion; his review bore the championship "Malcolm Gladwell Runs Out of Tricks". Junod coined a term called "The Gladwell Feint", whereby the author questions the obvious, and asserting that the reader'south preconceptions are wrong, before reassuring the reader that he has subconsciously known this all along. The Feint is an algorithm that produces reliably feel-expert stories. "Gladwell might be suspect as a philosopher, simply his credentials as the Horatio Alger of belatedly-period capitalism are unsurpassed."[seven] The New Republic reinforced this critique, calling the volume less insightful than a Chinese fortune cookie and topping the review with the headline "Malcolm Gladwell Is America's Best-Paid Fairy-Tale Writer".[8] The Wall Street Periodical lamented, "This is an entertaining volume. Simply it teaches niggling of general import, for the morals of the stories it tells lack solid foundations in evidence and logic."[9]
"To read David and Goliath is to endure the discomfort of watching a formidably intelligent author flailing—past citing all way of social-scientific studies and battering us with charts and tables and graphs—to bear witness something that no one would disagree with in the first identify", wrote Craig Seligman for Bloomberg News. "The further I read into David and Goliath, the more irritated I got. I wasn't persuaded there was much of a subject area there, just what really bugged me was the tone." Seligman concluded, "[I]n the by I've e'er felt flattered by Gladwell's writing. I like having things explained to me. Just I don't like existence talked downwardly to by someone who's telling me things I already know."[10]
However, Lucy Kellaway in the Fiscal Times wrote, "David and Goliath is Gladwell's most enjoyable book and then far. It is a feel-good extravaganza, nourishing both heart and listen… Gladwell is a chief at marching us off in 1 direction, only to stop upwardly taking usa somewhere else instead—somewhere better."[eleven]
See also [edit]
- Legitimacy (political)
References [edit]
- ^ "The New York Times Best Sellers". The New York Times. November 3, 2013. Archived from the original on March 22, 2016. Retrieved Baronial iii, 2017.
- ^ "David and Goliath". Us Today Books. Gannett. Archived from the original on April ii, 2015.
- ^ Malcolm Gladwell. "How David Beats Goliath Archived 2014-07-xi at the Wayback Automobile", newyorker.com, iv May 2009.
- ^ "Malcolm Gladwell'due south volume about underdogs". Cbc.ca. eleven July 2012. Archived from the original on 12 October 2013. Retrieved 9 July 2013.
{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)() - ^ Maslin, Janet. "Finding Talking Points Among the Underdogs Archived 2021-07-nineteen at the Wayback Machine", The New York Times, October 2, 2013.
- ^ Nocera, Joe. "Killing Giants Archived 2021-04-fourteen at the Wayback Automobile", The New York Times, October 11, 2013.
- ^ Junod, Tom. "Malcolm Gladwell Runs Out of Tricks Archived 2013-11-27 at the Wayback Machine", Esquire, November 25, 2013.
- ^ Gray, John. "Malcolm Gladwell Is America's Best-Paid Fairy-Tale Author Archived 2013-12-04 at the Wayback Motorcar", The New Republic, November 21, 2013.
- ^ Chabris, Christopher. "Volume Review: 'David and Goliath' by Malcolm Gladwell Archived 2017-02-10 at the Wayback Machine", The Wall Street Journal, September 28, 2013.
- ^ Seligman, Craig (September 29, 2013). "Gladwell Tells The states Stuff Only Dummies Don't Know: Books". Bloomberg. Archived from the original on 2021-04-xiv. Retrieved 2021-07-19 . (subscription required)
- ^ Kellaway, Lucy. "'David and Goliath' by Malcolm Gladwell". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 2015-09-24. Retrieved 2015-08-xix . (subscription required)
External links [edit]
- Official website
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_and_Goliath_(book)
0 Response to "How Many Pages Are in the Book David and Goliath Underdogs Misfits and the Art of Battling Giants"
Post a Comment